WVU Tries to Distance Itself From Its Faculty's Research
Coal industry has criticized school over MTR studies
Charleston Gazette
7 October 2011
By Ken Ward Jr.
CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- West Virginia University on Friday asked the
news media not to use the phrase "WVU study" to refer to research
by university faculty members, saying the findings of academic
papers don't reflect the position of the school.
In an email to the Gazette-Mail, WVU spokesman John Bolt said the
request to news media "was not developed in reaction to any
particular research being conducted on campus."
Bolt said a new university "statement" about faculty research was
intended as "an effort to explain the role of research at an
institution such as WVU and clarify that the institution itself
takes no position on the findings -- except in the sense of
supporting a researcher's right to do research and reach
supportable conclusions.
"The findings of any particular research project do not reflect --
nor should they -- any particular opinion or position of the
university itself," Bolt said in the email.
The move comes as a series of peer-reviewed papers by a WVU
faculty member about mountaintop removal's potential negative
public health effects are receiving widespread media coverage and
intense criticism from the coal industry.
Over the past four years, Michael Hendryx, an associate professor
in the WVU Medical School's Department of Community Medicine, has
co-authored at least 19 papers that examine associations between
high rates of illnesses and living near coal-mining operations.
Most recently, Hendryx co-authored papers that found significantly
higher rates of birth defects among residents near mountaintop
removal operations in central Appalachia and high rates of cancer
among residents near such operations along the Coal River Valley
in Southern West Virginia. Another paper, published in July, found
high rates of poverty in the region clustered around major surface
mines.
The work has been covered by a variety of media outlets, from a
nationally televised CNN documentary to the National Public Radio
environmental program "Living on Earth."
Hendryx has been harshly criticized by the coal industry. One
industry lobby group hired a consulting firm to try to discredit
his work, and an industry law firm alleged that any increased
birth defect rate in Appalachia could be related to inbreeding
among the region's residents.
Also for WVU, Hendryx's boss, community medicine director Alan
Ducatman, is leading a team of university faculty members who have
published a series of papers about the impact of the toxic
chemical C8, made by DuPont Co. in Parkersburg, on human health.
Ducatman is acting dean of WVU's planned School of Public Health,
and university officials have issued statements praising his work
providing "assistance to communities, government agencies, courts
and others in the evaluation and assessment of health risks
associated with environmental hazards and industrial operations."
WVU has promoted some of the Hendryx and Ducatman
studies, issuing news releases that sometimes referred to a
particular paper as a "WVU study."
In Friday's email message, Bolt asked news reporters to instead
use phrases such as "a study conducted at WVU" or "a study by [a]
WVU faculty member" when referring to any university research
findings.
Bolt did not return a phone call and indicated in an email that he
would be unable to provide answers to written questions by the
Gazette-Mail's Friday evening deadline.
Martin Snyder, a spokesman for the American Association of
University Professors, said there's nothing wrong with faculty or
institutions trying to make clear that the conclusions of research
papers are not necessarily the positions of the universities
themselves. However, he said, WVU's strategy for doing so is a bit
unusual.
"I don't remember seeing a university doing that before," Snyder
said, "but I'm not sure there's a huge problem with it."
Snyder said WVU officials apparently "have some level of
discomfort" with some research findings being published by
university faculty members and want to emphasize the findings
don't represent WVU's institutional views.
"It's clear they want to have that distinction observed," Snyder
said. "Faculty members often do research that embarrasses the
institution or embarrasses donors."
The new WVU statement says faculty members at the university "have
an obligation and responsibility to conduct research.
"It is part of WVU's mission as a land-grant university to gather
and analyze data and then contribute this analysis to inform the
discussion and understanding around various issues affecting the
lives of West Virginians and others around the world," the
statement says.
"WVU's research strives to be data-driven, objective and
independent," the statement says. "It is not influenced by any
political agenda, business priority, funding source or even
popular opinion. WVU faculty follow accepted academic practices,
and those research findings are subject to intense review and
challenge by academic peers -- including review of data sources,
methods and analysis.
"This doesn't mean everyone agrees with the findings, but assures
the process followed to reach those findings is valid and
unbiased," the statement says. "Accordingly, WVU stands behind its
researchers' quest for knowledge as they help society address the
issues which confront it."
Reach Ken Ward Jr. at kw...@wvgazette.com or 304-348-1702.