Benefits of EPA Air Rules Outweigh Costs, Report Says
Charleston Gazette
21 September 2011
By Ken Ward Jr.
CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- A series of air pollution rules from the
Obama administration provide major public health benefits with
dollar values far greater than their compliance costs, according
to a new report by a think tank affiliated with organized labor.
The Economic Policy Institute released its report as Republican
leaders in the House of Representatives have scheduled a series of
votes on measures aimed at scaling back, blocking or delaying the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposals.
Institute analysts warn, "Fears that these rules together will
deter economic progress are unjustified."
"The dollar value of the benefits of the major rules finalized or
proposed by the EPA so far during the Obama administration exceeds
the rules' costs by an exceptionally wide margin," the group's
report said. "Health benefits in terms of lives saved and
illnesses avoided will be enormous."
Legislation co-sponsored by Reps. Shelley Moore Capito and David
McKinley, both R-W.Va., would delay any EPA action on a
cross-state pollution rule and another measure to reduce toxic air
emissions from coal-fired power plants. The measure also would
create an interagency panel that would study how EPA proposals
would impact competitiveness, energy prices and employment.
EPA already performs cost-benefit studies on new environmental
rules, and the Economic Policy Institute used those studies to
examine the broader impacts of new air pollution measures being
considered by the agency. The institute concluded:
- Setting aside the Cross-State Air Pollution rule, the
combined annual benefits from all final major rules by the
Obama EPA exceed their costs by $10 billion to $95 billion a
year. The benefit-to-cost ratio ranges from 2-to-1 to 20-to-1.
- The net benefits from the Cross-State Air Pollution rule
exceed $100 billion a year (this rule is treated separately
because benefits accruing from action under the Bush
administration and the Obama administration cannot be
disentangled).
- The combined annual benefits from three major proposed
rules examined here exceed their costs by $62 billion to $188
billion a year. The benefit-to-cost ratio ranges from 6-to-1
to 15-to-1.
- When fully in effect in 2014, the combined costs of the
major rules finalized by the Obama administration's EPA would
amount to significantly less than 0.1 percent of the economy.
- Assuming the proposed rules are also finalized, when
fully in effect in 2016 the combined costs of the major EPA
rules finalized and proposed so far under the Obama
administration would amount to about 0.13 percent of the
economy.
"The regulations finalized and proposed by the Obama
administration are likely to be of tremendous value to the nation,
producing a wide range of significant health benefits," the report
said. "Further, the finding that the estimated costs of these
regulations amount to only about one-thousandth of the size of the
economy, as well as the extended period over which they will take
effect, indicate that they would not be a major impediment to
economic or job growth in the near-term or in the future."
Reach Ken Ward Jr. at kw...@wvgazette.com or 304-348-1702.