Pipeline Companies May Seek Eminent Domain
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
14 November 2010
By Timothy McNulty
Sitting in his family's 1785 stone farmhouse, Fayette County's Jim
Rosenberg may look out on his 49.5 acres one day soon and see a natural
gas company digging a 50-foot-wide Marcellus Shale pipeline through his
property -- regardless of whether he approved of it.
Unlike their immediate neighbors in rural Grindstone -- three miles
east of Brownsville -- Mr. Rosenberg and his wife have already resisted
requests to drill conventional natural gas wells on the property
they've lived on since 1974. If gas companies make pleas to build a
pipeline through their land, they plan to resist those too, but they
may not have a choice.
It's the latest worry for those Pennsylvanians suspicious of the
growing Marcellus Shale industry. Under applications currently before
the Public Utility Commission in Harrisburg, pipeline companies would
be able to use condemnation powers to gain rights-of-way, even from
unwilling landowners.
Peregrine Keystone Gas Pipeline, a Fort Worth, Texas, company that
builds and operates pipelines for transporting natural gas, is
proposing a $16 million project in Fayette, Greene and Washington
counties and has applied to the state to become a public utility, which
would give it the quasi-governmental power to traverse private
properties through eminent domain.
The company, which has utility status in Texas, says it has rarely used
the condemnation power and would much rather pay upfront for
rights-of-way than go through the complicated and costly eminent domain
process. Peregrine Keystone vice president Loren Fuller notes the
company has a spotless safety record and promises to avoid homes when
laying its pipeline.
Furthermore, according to gas industry experts, the move toward public
utility status by pipeline firms is likely driven more by long-term
business strategy than the ability to get condemnation powers.
Plenty of rural Pennsylvania property owners are in favor of getting
paid to host drilling rigs that bore a mile down to the Marcellus Shale
deposit, or to grant easements to let "midstream" companies such as
Peregrine build pipelines between wells and long-distance distribution
pipelines. It is other owners such as Mr. Rosenberg who are worried by
the latest move.
"If eminent domain seizes property from one private property owner and
gives it to another private property owner, that is very problematic.
Things like that I have a big problem with," said Mr. Rosenberg, an
information technology technician who officially objected to
Peregrine's utility application.
"It's common talk around here to hear people say, 'You might as well
sign the lease, they're going to take it anyway.'
That's not true. ... People commonly believe it, but it's pretty
important to be asking if this is a real thing, and to get an awful lot
of clarification," he said.
Peregrine filed its application for public utility status in September,
following a similar request in January by another pipeline firm called
Laser Northeast Gathering in Susquehanna County. Both applications are
being watched -- and in many cases criticized -- by other firms in the
natural gas industry that worry utility status would invite unwanted
government oversight of the state's fledgling midstream pipeline
industry.
Utility status means extra regulation from the utility commission and a
ceiling on rates and tariffs, which some firms want to avoid. Competing
firms -- such as Laurel Mountain Midstream of Moon, which operates in
the same counties as Peregrine -- complained to the PUC that utility
status could give Peregrine exclusive pipeline rights to the area.
"The administrative granting of service territories to natural gas
gatherers, and particularly exclusive service territories, runs
contrary to the business of natural gas gathering, which is a
competitive industry where market forces govern behavior, particularly
with respect to siting," said the company's official complaint.
Pipelines are a major growth sector in the Marcellus-related gas
industry. It looks like there will be a glut in the natural gas
industry for some time -- with the amount of gas in excess of its
demand -- a factor that should benefit pipeline companies that are paid
to move and store it, explained Duquesne University energy industry
expert Kent Moors.
Marcellus Shale gas may be cheaper than that produced elsewhere in the
country and that will "move the more expensive gas out of the market.
That's one of the reasons why, maybe, these companies are coming up
from Texas," Dr. Moors said.
He said eminent domain power is not the big driver behind utility
status -- companies that move gasoline and some hazardous materials are
already recognized as public utilities by the state -- and the firms
would rather avoid the procedure when negotiating for rights-of-way. If
a landowner resists a utility easement request, the matter goes before
a judicial board that determines a fair value, which is paid to the
owner in exchange for the right-of-way.
Eminent domain's condemnation power is still an effective tool for the
industry, said Dave Messersmith of the Penn State Cooperative Extension
Marcellus Education Team in Wayne County. "If they are doing a project
from point A to point B and one or two property owners in the way are
not willing to negotiate right-of-way, that really makes that project
one that isn't very viable," he said.
Peregrine would need 50 feet of right-of-way to dig its pipelines and
bar property owners from building or planting
deep-rooted trees on a 30-foot-wide strip of land once it was laid.
"If there is one tree in the backyard that their grandkids swing on, we
talk to landowners to accommodate avoiding things like that," said Mr.
Fuller. "It's a business decision with condemnation. Instead of
allocating for those legal proceedings, we'd much rather pay the
landowner" upfront, he said.
Peregrine says 90 percent of the pipeline construction's costs would be
funneled through local supplies and labor, benefiting the local economy.
Veronica Coptis, a community organizer for Fayette County's Mountain
Watershed Association, counters that the fight is really about the
bottom line for the powerful industry, using the privately held
resources of Pennsylvanians.
"This is stepping on private property rights, whether people want these
[pipelines] on their property or not," she said. "Where do we draw the
line? What is the greater good? ... We're shading the black and white
areas and making them more gray."
Tim McNulty: tmcnulty@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1581.