River Watch: Monongahela Water Quality Debate Bubbles Up

Army Corps invites various interests to join watershed study

Pittsburgh Business Times
10 December 2010
By Anya Litvak

As the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers embarks on a study of the Upper Monongahela River watershed and searches for stakeholders in the process, it might be wise to prepare for a crowd.

The number of voices with concerns about water quality in the region is growing. State regulators are concerned about high levels of total dissolved solids and sulfates. The business community is worried about mandated reductions in discharges to the waterway. Oil and gas contractors will need to treat their water to a drinking water standard if they want to discharge it into the river come Jan. 1. And a number of researchers and independent groups are watching how the region’s energy industry is affecting the watershed.

The Corps’ Mon River study, which will involve public meetings in the spring to identify issues in the watershed, appends an Ohio River Basin Comprehensive Reconnaissance Report that identified several priority watersheds for closer inspection. It also will look at fish and wildlife and navigation issues.

“We’re already aware that the water quality issues are going to be the big issue,” said Corps environmental resource specialist Ashley Petraglia.

The study will take about a year and a half and, should further funding be identified, may lead to recommendations for projects to improve the watershed. In the meantime, the Corps is looking to start a dialogue about stakeholder concerns through the public meeting process.

Debates about water quality must be qualified by how it’s measured, especially when it comes to total dissolved solids, which takes a few steps to assess. There are three ways to gauge TDS counts. One is to analyze a sample in the lab testing for concentrations of specific salts and metals. Another is to take water samples and boil them, weighing the sample before and after evaporation to measure the weight of the remaining solids. Both of these are labor intensive and cannot be done in real time. A quick and continuous way is to use conductivity readings, assuming that TDS counts are 70 percent of conductivity measurements. Conductivity indicates the presence of ions in the water that can carry an electric current.

The Corps’ Pittsburgh District uses both, and according to Rose Reilly, a biologist with the agency, decades of historical data shows both measurements to be very close.

According to her calculations, the Mon River at Elizabeth inched above 500 parts per million twice in August, during periods of very low flow, which prevented dilution. That’s based on conductivity measurements.

But not everyone is satisfied with the formula. Last week, the Allegheny Conference on Community Development told its members to rally the DEP against seeking an impairment designation for the part of the river near the Elizabeth Lock and Dam because the conference claimed the state agency was relying on conductivity readings rather than direct samples. The DEP has indicated to the Environmental Protection Agency that it might seek the

designation based on elevated levels of TDS and sulfates in the water. It had not done so by midday Thursday.

David Sternberg, an EPA spokesman, said the agency typically grants about 95 percent of such requests from states and that deliberations last two months on average.

If the DEP asks and is granted the impairment label for the Mon, facilities with permits to discharge into the river would become part of a TDS reduction plan and would see their permits amended for lower discharges, according to DEP spokesman Michael Smith.

Among the companies discharging into the area of the Mon around the Elizabeth Lock and Dam are U.S. Steel, Allegheny Energy, CONSOL Energy Inc. and Eastman Chemical.

“The data shows that the river is in compliance,” said Ken Zapinski, senior vice president for transportation and infrastructure with the Allegheny Conference. “There were genuine problems in 2008. but thanks to DEP’s actions, and thanks to industry cooperating and coming up with new and innovative (solutions), (TDS counts) are below the regulatory limit of 500 parts per million.”

He noted that coal producers have adjusted their discharges to periods of high flow so as to dilute them and many oil and gas producers, who Zapinksi said were unfairly targeted by the DEP after the TDS spikes in the fall of 2008, now are recycling their wastewater to avoid discharging into the rivers.

Zapinski said the conference would be interested in being part of the watershed study and talking about these issues with the Corps.

Judging water quality is far from straightforward

Total dissolved solids have become the proxy for concern over the quality of the Monongahela River.

“In general, the consensus is, over the past two years, the water quality has changed,” said Jeanne VanBriesen, director of Carnegie Mellon University’s Center for Water Quality in Urban Environmental Systems. “It is saltier than it was yesterday, and there is a concern that is worth investigating.”

Ron Schwartz, assistant regional director with the Department of Environmental Protection’s southwestern district, said the worst year for the Mon River in recent memory was 2008, when TDS concentrations spiked repeatedly during the summer months.

“In 2009, there were a number of values over 500 (parts per million — the drinking water standard) and in 2010, we do have some above 500,” he said, but, overall, the quality of the water has improved. Nevertheless, Schwartz cautioned that flow rates over the past three years were three times higher than the historical low point, meaning a dry season could make TDS spike.

To further complicate things, not all total dissolved solids are created equal. Researchers have been studying the compounds that make up TDS and looking for certain markers to link them to the industries that produce them.

For example, Mon River water has traditionally been high in sulfates, which are an indication of mine water discharges. Sulfates make up about 50 percent of TDS, according to measurements. Chlorides comprise about 10 percent. In the fall of 2008, when TDS spiked, so did chloride readings, and regulators began to suspect Marcellus Shale flowback water, which is extremely high in salt content when undiluted, was being disposed in the river. But a direct link was difficult, since chloride also is present in wastewater from power plants.

VanBriesen began to test for bromide, another salt typically found near the ocean and in some Marcellus Shale water, as a unique marker of flowback water disposal. She’s found it in very low concentrations, which showed a spike in mid-July and subsided in August.

The DEP is looking into the finding, Schwartz said, but stressed no link to the oil and gas industry has been established. “The obvious isn’t always the reality,” he said.

alitvak@bizjournals.com | (412) 208-3824